Global 6G Race: Comparative Analysis of National Strategies and Investments
Dr. James A. Lewis, Dr. Samantha Bradshaw
CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies)
Abstract
This policy paper provides a comparative analysis of 6G national strategies from the US, EU, China, Japan, South Korea, and India. We evaluate each strategy across dimensions of funding ($35B+ globally), research focus areas, standardization approaches, and industrial policy. The analysis reveals three distinct models: market-driven (US), state-coordinated (China), and public-private partnership (EU, Japan, Korea). Each model has different implications for 6G technology leadership and global competitiveness.
AI Summary
- Comparative analysis of 6G strategies across US, EU, China, Japan, Korea, and India.
- Over $35B in combined global 6G investment commitments identified.
- Three distinct models: market-driven, state-coordinated, public-private partnership.
- Evaluates implications for technology leadership and global competitiveness.
Key Findings
- 1China leads in total 6G funding but US leads in private sector R&D investment.
- 2EU emphasizes sustainability and digital sovereignty in its 6G approach.
- 3South Korea and Japan are closest to early 6G commercial trials (2028).
Industry Implications
6G will be a major arena for technology competition among nations.
International collaboration is needed on spectrum and standards despite competition.
Policy choices made in 2026-2027 will significantly influence 6G outcomes.
Read the Original Paper
Access the full paper on arXiv for complete methodology, results, and references.
Open on arXivRelated Papers
Ethical AI in 6G Networks: A Framework for Responsible Deployment
Umea University / Oxford Internet Institute — 25 citations
Standards/Policy Papers6G and the EU AI Act: Compliance Framework for Network AI Systems
CEPS Brussels / Humboldt University Berlin — 21 citations
Standards/Policy PapersWRC-27 Preparatory Analysis: Spectrum Needs for 6G Upper Mid-Band
University of Cambridge / Trinity College Dublin — 32 citations